Did your legal CRM vendor build it, or license it?

Short version: we did not build the engine underneath LegalCRM.pro. We license it, configure it for law firm intake, and support it from Coral Gables. The platform provider is named, with the data it processes, on our advertising compliance page.

How most legal CRMs are actually built

A lot of the intake and follow-up products sold to law firms sit on a handful of underlying platforms. It is recognizable once you have seen a few: the pipeline builder, the automation editor, and the form tool look alike from one product to the next, because they are the same tool with a different logo on it.

There is nothing wrong with that. Licensing a mature platform buys deliverability, telephony, uptime, and a security posture a small team could not build or maintain. The part worth being straight about is the arrangement itself, because it is hard to verify from outside and unwelcome to discover after signing.

What we actually sell

The engine is licensed. You pay us for everything between that engine and a working intake for your firm, plus a person in the same county to call when something breaks.

• • The build: intake fields with the opposing party on them, pipeline stages that run from inquiry to signed retainer, and sequences configured for personal injury, immigration, family, and criminal intake rather than for a generic business.
• • The templates: every automated message written to fit Chapter 4-7 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, in English and Spanish, and put in front of your attorney for approval before it can send.
• • The compliance configuration: A2P 10DLC brand and campaign registration completed before your first text, so the carriers do not silently filter it; consent capture; opt-out that works in both languages.
• • Local support: we are at 338 Minorca Avenue in Coral Gables, and most of the firms we work with are a short drive away.

The four questions a law firm should ask any intake vendor

A clinic asks about uptime and a store asks about integrations. A law firm has four questions nobody else has, and a vendor that has not heard them before is a vendor that has not sold to law firms before.

• • How is prospective-client information handled? What a person tells your intake is protected under Rule 4-1.18 whether or not they hire you. Ask where it is stored, who at the vendor can see it, whether there is a Data Processing Addendum, and how it is deleted. Ours: encrypted at rest and in transit, role-based access, a signed DPA, export and deletion on request, and the subprocessor chain published.
• • How is the vendor paid? Rule 4-7.17 limits what a lawyer may pay for a recommendation. A vendor paid per lead or per signed case is a different arrangement from one paid a flat fee for software, and your Bar counsel will want to know which. Ours: a flat monthly subscription. Not per lead, not per case, not per referral.
• • Who is responsible for what the system sends? Under Rule 4-7.11, the firm is, including for messages a vendor sends on its behalf. So ask whether you approve every template before it goes live, and whether that approval is recorded. Ours: yes and yes.
• • Can it say anything that reads as legal advice? A voice agent or a chatbot that answers a case question in your firm’s name is an unauthorized-practice problem you did not sign up for. Ours is scoped to scheduling and logistics, discloses that it is automated, and escalates anything about the case to a person.

Why a raw platform account is not the same purchase

You can license a generic account on most of these platforms directly, and for some firms that is the right call. What arrives is a blank canvas built for agencies, gyms, and online stores: no conflict-check fields, no retainer stage, no bilingual routing, no in-custody escalation, no Bar-reviewed templates, no carrier registration. Building those is most of the work, and it takes longer than a weekend.

If you have someone in-house who can configure and maintain it, that route makes sense and we would say so on a call. If not, the comparison is not our price against a raw license fee. It is our price against that fee plus the months of setup, plus the templates nobody reviewed against Rule 4-7.13.

On compliance claims

No CRM is "Bar compliant" on its own, ours included. Compliance is a status your firm holds, not a feature a product has, and it is shared three ways: the platform provides the infrastructure, we configure and register it, and your firm approves the words, clears the conflicts, and stays responsible for its advertising. What no vendor can do is manufacture consent you did not collect or approval you did not give.

Why we say it up front

Mostly because finding out afterwards feels like being handled, and that is a poor way to start a multi-year relationship with a firm whose whole business is judgment about other people’s candor. If you want the platform provider’s name and the data it handles, it is on the advertising compliance page.

Questions we get asked about this

Related